William Barr MRCVS
William Lockhart MRCVS |
(017683) 71359 |
|
 |
| We aim to provide a friendly, helpful
and affordable veterinary service to all our clients. |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Wormer
Resistance and Improving Drenching Technique
Back
to Farm Factsheets Index |
| |
| Gastrointestinal
roundworms are still a major contributor to reduced
efficacy of production in many intensive sheep rearing
enterprises, particularly through sub-clinical infections.
Control is heavily dependent on the regular use
of anthelmintics (wormers/drenches), combined where
practicable with pasture management. The long-term
sustainability of frequent drenching with anthelmintics
has been questioned in view of the increasing prevalence
of strains of roundworms which have developed resistance
to one or more classes of drugs. Anthelmintic resistance
has become a major problem over the last decade
in many sheep rearing areas of the Southern Hemisphere.
For example in parts of South Africa, South America
and Australia there are farms with roundworms which
are resistant to all three classes of broadspectrum
anthelmintics (benzimidazoles, levamisole, avemectins)
and also some narrow spectrum wormers such as the
salicylanilides (closantel). Fortunately, the situation
in the UK is less serious, the development of anthelmintic
resistance has been slower. This may in part be
due to less frequent treatment and the species of
worm involved but also to the fact that only a very
small proportion of the overall population of worms
are within the animal at any point in time, the
majority of the population being present on the
pasture as free-living infective larvae. As a consequence
only a small fraction of the overall population
will be exposed to the drug ensuring that the selection
pressure from a single treatment remains low. It
is important that farmers adopt strategic worming
strategies and techniques to delay the development
and transmission of resistant roundworms and this
News Sheet highlights practical advice on the use
of wormers. |
 |
![]() |
 |
| Selection
for Drug Resistance |
|
Although most farmers will be familiar
with the term selection as a process to
seek beneficial traits in their animals,
the same process can also produce disadvantageous
traits such as the selection of the genes
related to drug resistance in worms. Resistance
arises when there is a change in the susceptibility
of the worm population to the drug or drugs
used to control them. The gene or genes
that are associated with anthelmintic resistance
(AR) occur naturally at very low frequencies
within the parasite population. When a drug
is first introduced then the vast majority
of the worm population is fully susceptible
(homozygous susceptible) to the drug, a
small proportion carries some of the genes
that confer resistance (heterozygous resistant)
and a tiny number of worms may be fully
resistant (homozygous resistant). When worms
are exposed to anthelmintics then only those
individuals that carry the AR gene(s) will
survive and pass these resistant genes onto
their offspring. As resistance increases
a greater proportion of the worm population
will carry these genes and be able to survive
treatment. Because anthelmintic resistance
arises through selection the rate at which
it develops on a farm will vary according
to the frequency of resistance genes within
the treated population and the selection
pressure applied to that population.
At any given time only a small percentage
of the total parasite population is normally
resident within the host, the majority of
the population being present on grass as
worm eggs, developing larvae and infective
larvae. Each time animals are treated with
an anthelmintic only highly resistant worms
(homozygous resistant individuals) survive
and for about three weeks after treatment
(the time that it takes for reinfection
and maturation within the host to occur)
only resistant eggs are passed onto the
pasture. In this way the proportion of resistant
individuals within the population increases
very slightly but if treatments are well
spaced out the rate of selection will be
sufficiently slow to be virtually negligible.
However, if we treat frequently (every 3-4
weeks) then we exert a high selection pressure
and resistance may develop quite quickly.
Underdosing animals also increases the
rate of selection simply by enabling worms
that carry some of the genes (heterozygous
resistant individuals) that confer resistance
to survive. The manufacturer's recommended
dose rate for a drug are set so that it
kills all of the heterozygous and homozygous
susceptible worms. If animals are underdosed
then some of the heterozygous resistant
individuals survive and thus increase the
frequency of resistance genes within the
total population. In this way underdosing
exerts a strong selection pressure and can
lead to the rapid development of resistance.
The proportions of homozygous, heterozygous
and susceptible individuals in the parasite
population within the host and on pasture
will, until some selection pressure is placed
on the population, be relatively stable.
Normally the free-living population on
pasture, which usually comprises the bulk
of the population, provides a reservoir
of susceptibility. However, under certain
circumstances, the majority of the parasite
population may be resident within the host
rather than on the pasture. If treatments
are given at such times then resistant populations
may be selected rapidly, simply because
the worms that survive treatment and carry
the genes that confer resistance will re-populate
the pasture. These conditions occur naturally
in many tropical/subtropical countries where
seasonal changes in climate ensure that
the majority of the free-living population
on pasture dies out. A similar situation
exists in the UK when animals are moved
post-treatment onto clean pasture or for
those parasite species that cannot survive
over winter on pasture.
top
|
 |
![]() |
 |
| Prevalence
of Resistant Strains in the UK |
|
The first reports of anthelmintic resistant
roundworms in the UK were published in the
1980s, since which time there have been
a number of reports and surveys. In the
early 1990s a detailed random survey was
conducted in England and Wales. The results
indicate that anthelmintic resistance is
increasing in sheep flocks in England with
a higher incidence of white drench (benzimidazole)
resistance (44%) being recorded in the south
west of England than in the North East (15%).
A selective survey in Scotland indicated
an overall prevalence of benzimidazole resistance
of 24%. Recent surveys in England and Scotland
have shown that the prevalence of benzimidazole
resistance is higher in non-dairy goats
(65 - 70%). All of these reports suggest
that Ostertagia is the worm most commonly
implicated in anthelmintic resistance in
the UK with Haemonchus present on some farms,
particularly in the more southern counties
of England. Recently there have been reports
which indicate that the range of gastrointestinal
parasites showing resistance in the UK is
increasing.
At present resistance is mainly confined
to the benzimidazole group although there
have been reports of levamisole resistance
and ivermectin resistance in goats and cattle.
Multiple resistance, resistance against
two or more drug families, has been reported
in the UK in cashmere and angora goats.
Although the total number of goats in the
UK is small compared to sheep goats can
play a significant role in the selection
and transmission of anthelmintic resistance
since the same parasites will infect both
hosts.
Goats are particularly susceptible to roundworms
and do not mount the same level of immune
response as infected sheep; consequently
goat management systems often rely heavily
on frequent anthelmintic treatments. Goats
also tend to be treated at the same dose
rates as sheep and, because they metabolise
and clear anthelmintics more rapidly than
sheep, goats are often underdosed. Both
increased frequency of treatment and underdosing
are factors which increase the rate of selection
of resistant genes and have led to the high
incidence of AR in goats in the southern
hemisphere.
top
|
 |
![]() |
 |
| Effective
Drenching |
|
1. Underdosing
The drench needs to be administered accurately
to obtain maximum efficacy against the worms
as the dose is calculated as a volume per
Kg liveweight. The manufacturers instructions
should always be followed, Underdosing can
lead to selection of worms which are partially
resistant OM (heterozygotes) to an anthelmintic.
It is important therefore to weight representative
groups of sheep and then dose to the heaviest
animals within the group being treated.
It is better to slightly overdose than underdose.
Regularly cheek that the drenching gun is
delivering the correct volume of wormer
(use a measuring cylinder to calibrate).
2. Increasing the Efficacy of the Drench
It is important when dosing lambs to ensure
that the drench is given over the back of
the tongue and not just into the mouth.
The reason for this is that in a proportion
of lambs an anthelmintic given into the
mouth may result in the drug going down
the oesophageal groove into the abomasum
(4th stomach) rather than passing direct
into the rumen (1st stomach) which occurs
with 'over the tongue' drenching. Passage
of drug directly into the abomasum can result
in reduced drug uptake and lower efficacy
against the worms (see Figure 1 below).

Figure 1 - The effect of rumen
bypass on drench concentration
Research suggests that some oral anthelmintics
work for longer in the gut if the animals
rumens are relatively empty before dosing.
An improvement in the efficacy of some oral
anthelmintics (I-BZ; 3-AYclasses) can be
obtained by short-term withdrawal of feed(see
Figure 2 below). This has the effect of
reducing rumen-fill which will slow the
passage of the drug in the digesta and improve
its uptake. Studies have shown an increase
in efficacy of up to 40% for the white drenches.
Try to withhold feed for 12-24 hours before
drenching and for about 3 hours afterwards.
This simple procedure should improve the
efficacy of orally administered benzimidazoles
or ivermectin. However, ewes in late pregnancy
should not have their feed withheld due
to the risk of inducing pregnancy toxaemia.

Figure 2 - The effect of reducing
rumen fill on drench concentration
top
|
 |
![]() |
 |
| Conclusions |
|
Anthelmintic resistant strains of roundworms
(mainly to the white drenches) are present
on an increasing number of sheep farms in
the UK but by taking appropriate action
the situation should be manageable. It is
essential to reduce the selection pressure
for development of drug resistance by adopting
some of the practical recommendations highlighted
in the News Sheet. It is apparent that the
development of sustainable control strategies
will depend upon integrating different approaches
to control since this combined approach
employs several elements each of which should
exert minimal selection pressure rather
than a single element exerting a high selection
pressure. In this way the efficacy of the
current broad-spectrum wormers on the market
will be conserved.
Appendix: Broadspectrum Anthelminties for
Sheep and Goats 1-BZ class of anthelmintics
(Benzimidazoles /Probenzimidazoles)
Oral Drenches
| Tradename
(Manufacturer) |
Chemical
(withdrawal period) |
IW |
AW |
T |
L |
AF |
S/G |
| Albazole 2.5% SC (Dunlops) |
Albendazole (4) |
+# |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+* |
S |
| Supavem (Janssen) |
Mebendazole / closantel
(42) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+** |
S |
| Fasinex 5% (Novartis) |
Triclabendazole
(28) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
+** |
S |
| Levacide 3% drench
(Norbrook) |
Levamisole (21) |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
S |
| Levitape Drench |
Levamisole & Praziquantal |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
- |
S |
| Dectomax injectable
for cattle and sheep (Pfizer) |
Doramectin (56) |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
S |
| Cydectn injectable
for cattle or sheep (Fort Dodge) |
Moxidectin (70) |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
S |
| Ivomec injection for
sheep (Merial) |
Ivermectin (42) |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
S |
| Panamec Injection for cattle, sheep
and pigs (Merial) |
Ivemectin (42) |
+ |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
S |
Key to Symbols:
| + |
Effective |
| - |
Not Effective |
| IW |
Developing immature stages of gastrointestinal
roundworms (# for efficacy against arrested
larvae. |
| AW |
Mature adult gastrointestinal roundworms |
| T |
Tapeworms |
| L |
Lungworms |
| AF |
Adult liver fluke (+* increased dose
rate required for high efficacy) (**
also effective against immature fluke). |
| S/G |
Sheep/goats |
| Se |
Selenium |
| Co |
Cobalt |
top
|
|
| |
|
If you have any questions, problems or suggestions
at all please do not hesitate to contact us. You
can be assured that everyone at Barr and
Lockhart will do their very best to be
of assistance. contact |
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
top |
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|